The use of derivatives can result in large losses because of the use of leverage/gearing, or borrowing . Derivatives allow investors to earn large returns from small movements in the underlying asset's price. However, investors could lose large amounts if the price of the underlying moves against them significantly.
Derivatives focus mostly on two types of risk: Market Risk and Credit Risk
The derivatives market has arrangements in place to mitigate unwanted risks that arise from conducting derivatives transactions. The OTC, Clearing (OTC) and Exchange-Traded have different levels of risk due to their particular characteristics.
In general, we can conclude that the less standardized transactions have a significantly higher risk compared to highly regulated, traded and standardized Exchange-Traded transactions.
Market Risk |
Credit Risk |
Counterparty Risk | Settlement Risk |
Market risk is exposure to the possibility of market movements. Market movements are changes in price or rate of a given underlying (or in value when related to a number of underlyings) that will be delivered in the future. A market risk derivatives contract allows one party to obtain and another party to divest itself of the risk of the price of the underlying moving during an agreed contract period. The universe of those exposed to market risk is wide. - A company that consumes raw material/commodities incurs price risk. - A company that engages in international commerce incurs foreign exchange risk. - A company that borrows money incurs interest rate risk. - A company that invests in other traded firms incurs securities pricing risk. Each of these is a potential risk seller, or possibly even a risk buyer, via market risk derivatives. |
Credit risk is exposure to the possibility that a counterparty will default on its obligations when due because of insolvency. Credit risk centers on a specific entity, although market-wide credit deterioration may affect the credit quality of discrete counterparties because of the interlinking of credit exposures. While credit risk is distinct from market risk, in some cases, credit risk can correlate with market risk. Importantly, derivatives do not eliminate underlying risk; they only reposition it. Often, people will use the phrase risk management to explain why parties employ derivatives. This can be misleading because many understand risk management to mean reduction of risk and risk reduction is only one reason to use derivatives. |
A party to an OTC derivatives contract faces the risk that the counterparty will fail. This is credit risk and can be divided into two relevant categories: - Counterparty Risk - Settlement Risk Counterparty risk is the risk that the counterparty will become insolvent sometime during the life of the derivatives transaction prior to settlement. |
Settlement risk is the risk that, on the settlement date, one party will meet its requirement and the other will not. If the counterparty's failure is due to insolvency, the counterparty may never fulfill its obligation and the compliant party may never have its payment returned. If the counterparty's failure is due to something more mundane, say an operational failure, the compliant party's rights should be enforceable. However, even in the latter context, a delay in settlement is no small affair. A counterparty's failure to settle in a timely fashion can jeopardize the liquidity of the compliant party, which may depend on precisely timed counterparty payments to meet other obligations. To address settlement risk generally, parties can engage in payment netting, also called settlement netting. |
Liquidity Risk |
Operational Risk |
Legal Risk | Systemic Risk |
Liquidity risk is the risk that a party will be unable to transact without extraordinary cost or loss due to a lack of immediately available resources or prospects. In the context of OTC derivatives, this risk breaks down into two types: - funding liquidity risk - market liquidity risk. Funding liquidity risk is the risk that a party will not meet its payment obligations due to a temporary cash shortage. If the risk referred to a permanent cash shortage, the risk would more appropriately be called credit risk. In financial institutions, funding liquidity risk arises from cash-flow mismatches, which in turn arise from mismanagement of trades. Market liquidity risk is the risk that a party will not be able to terminate a transaction prior to maturity. Most OTC derivatives contracts are not normally assignable without the consent of the counterparty. This makes them difficult to liquidate, with only limited ways to unwind, i.e., terminate. |
Operational risk is the possibility that a derivatives investor internal systems will fail to measure adequately, monitor effectively, or control intelligently the risks to which the investor is exposed. |
Generally speaking, parties to OTC derivatives contracts run the risk that certain provisions will not be enforced, either at all or as intended. They might even run the risk that the contracts themselves will be voided. Indeed, even the best-crafted derivatives contract in the most transparent and permissive legal regime runs the risk that the law will change during the life of the derivatives transaction. Legal risk can attach to the contract itself. For example: (i) The contract might be viewed as unenforceable because it is an improper gambling arrangement or an unlicensed provision of insurance; (ii) the contract language might fail to describe precisely the arrangement an injured party intended; Legal risk can also attach to the counterparty. (i) The counterparty might not have the legal capacity to enter into the contract, (ii) the counterparty might be restricted in the purposes for which it enters the derivatives transaction. |
Systemic risk is the risk that the whole financial system will collapse because of the initial failure of just one or a few players. According to the critics, each derivatives transaction transfers underlying risk and creates credit risk because a derivatives party may fail to make required payments or deliveries under the derivatives contract. Thus, active derivatives trading generates a web of transactions and credit exposures, as party after party seeks to pass off some of the market or credit risk it has obtained under a derivatives transaction via another derivatives transaction, until a complex network of financial inter dependencies arises among many financial institutions. Under a worst case scenario, one of the derivatives contract parties fails, and then many other parties to many other derivatives contracts also fail, in an unavoidable chain reaction that eventually collapses the financial system. |
Futures & Forwards |
Swaps |
Options |
Others |
A Forward is an agreement between two parties to deliver an asset in the future at a predetermined price. Futures are the exchange-traded equivalent. |
A Swap is an agreement between two parties to exchange payments/cash flows on regular dates for an agreed period of time. Each payment leg is calculated on a different basis. In a standard or 'plain vanilla' IRS a party agrees to make future payments to the counterparty determined by reference to a certain fixed or floating rate on a notional amount, and the counterparty agrees to make reciprocal payments at a market floating rate on a notional amount. A Swap is composed of a series of forward contract. |
An Option is an agreement that gives the buyer/holder, who pays a fee (premium), the right - but not the obligation - to buy (Call) or sell (Put) a specified amount of an underlying asset at a preset price (strike or exercise price) The other side of the transaction is taken by the seller or writer of the option contract. |
Other or Exotic derivatives, refer to derivative instruments which have features making them more complex than commonly traded, "plain vanilla", products. Note that the term has no precise scope: the definition is dependent on time and place. |
Hedging |
Speculation |
Arbitrage |
Hedging is protecting. More specifically, it is the process by which an exposed entity enters into a transaction that will generate profit in the exact circumstances that would generate a loss under the exposure. |
Speculators buy or sell derivatives without true exposure to or core interest in the underlying risk. While speculators increase their holistic exposure, hedgers reduce their holistic exposure. |
Arbitrageurs are market players who take advantage of either price mismatches or artificially restricted opportunities or who stake positions before markets react to certain events.
|
Hedging |
Speculation |
Arbitrage |
Hedging is protecting. More specifically, it is the process by which an exposed entity enters into a transaction that will generate profit in the exact circumstances that would generate a loss under the exposure. |
Speculators buy or sell derivatives without true exposure to or core interest in the underlying risk. While speculators increase their holistic exposure, hedgers reduce their holistic exposure. |
Arbitrageurs are market players who take advantage of either price mismatches or artificially restricted opportunities or who stake positions before markets react to certain events.
|
Derivatives come in flavors from plain vanilla to mint chocolate-chip. In practice, financial derivatives cover a diverse spectrum of underlyings, including equity or stock indices, exchange rates, interest rates or bonds, credit characteristics, commodities or more exotic underlyings (i.e., weather characteristics).
Human creativity, however, can make derivatives complex and therefore at the mint chocolate-chip end of the spectrum the sky is the limit.
Practically nothing limits the financial
instruments, reference rates, or indices that can serve as the underlying for a financial derivatives contract.
Some derivatives, moreover, can be based
on more than one underlying. For example, the value of a financial derivative
may depend on the difference between a domestic interest rate and a
foreign interest rate (i.e., two separate reference rates).
See the following additional information:
The foreign exchange market is the most liquid financial market in the world.
As such, it has been referred to as the market closest to the ideal of perfect competition, notwithstanding currency intervention by central banks.
According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), as of April 2010, average daily turnover in global foreign exchange markets is estimated at $ 3.98 trillion, a growth of approximately 20% over the $3.21 trillion daily volume as of April 2007.
The $3.98 trillion break-down is as follows:
$1.490 trillion in spot transactions --- non-derivative
$475 billion in outright forwards --- derivative
$1.765 trillion in foreign exchange swaps --- derivative
$43 billion currency swaps --- derivative
$207 billion in options and other products --- derivative
Exchange-Traded |
Cleared (OTC) |
Over-the-counter (OTC) |
Daily settlement (mark to market) and margin calls |
Daily settlement (mark to market) and margin calls |
|